American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 112-118, March 2006

Screening for obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based analysis

  • Kenny P. Pang, FRCSEd, FRCSI(OTO), FAMS(ORL)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
    • Department of Otolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, Republic of Singapore. Tel.: +65 63577742; fax: +65 63577749.
  • ,
  • David J. Terris, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

Received 28 June 2005

Abstract 

Sleep disordered breathing is a spectrum of diseases that includes snoring, upper airway resistance syndrome, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obstructive sleep apnea is a common sleep disorder and is estimated to have an incidence of 24% in men and 9% in women. However, many authors believe that up to 93% of women and 82% of men with moderate to severe OSA remain undiagnosed. There is a strong link between sleep disordered breathing and hypertension, believed to be due to sleep fragmentation, intermittent hypoxemia, and increased sympathetic tone, which results in a higher mortality and morbidity rate among these patients. It is therefore desirable to attempt to diagnose all patients with OSA, to institute early treatment intervention, and to prevent development of cardiovascular complications. The gold standard for diagnosing OSA remains the attended overnight level I polysomnogram. However, in view of the limited resources, including limited number of recording beds, high cost, long waiting lists, and labor requirements, many authors have explored the use of clinical predictors or questionnaires that may help to identify higher-risk patients. Screening devices in the form of single or multiple channel monitoring systems have also been introduced and may represent an alternative method to diagnose OSA. The ideal screening device should be cheap, readily accessible, easily used with minimal instructions, have no risk or side effects to the patient, and be safe and accurate. We review a variety of clinical predictive formulae and several screening devices available for the diagnosis of OSA.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0196-0709(05)00169-9

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.09.002

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 112-118, March 2006