American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 238-243, July 2006

Outcomes in children with perforated tympanic membranes after tympanostomy tube placement: results using a pilot treatment algorithm

Podium presentation at the 2005 Society for Ear, Nose, and Throat Advances in Children Meeting, December 2-5, 2005, Toronto, Canada.

  • Scott A. Schraff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Markham, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Camille Welch, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, USA
  • ,
  • David H. Darrow, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Craig S. Derkay, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Ave, Suite 510, Norfolk, VA 23507-1914, USA.

Abstract 

Purpose

The objective of this study was to examine the success of a pilot treatment algorithm for tympanic membrane perforations in children after tympanostomy tube placement.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart review of children with diagnosed tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement from 1998 to 2003 at a tertiary care children's hospital was performed. The patients had been treated according to an algorithm used by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists for management of tympanic membrane perforations: observation vs myringoplasty. Success rates were examined.

Results

Ninety-five children were identified, 27% of whom had nonhealing perforations after tube extrusion; 73% of the perforations were caused by a retained tube. The median duration of tube retention was 48 months, ranging from 13 to 120 months. After the treatment protocol, 76% of the patients underwent gelatin film or paper patch myringoplasty, 23% had adipose myringoplasty, and 1% were observed. Overall, 91% had healed perforations after the first intervention. Among those requiring a second intervention, the sizes of initial perforations were between 15% and 40%, with postrepair perforation sizes between 5% and 40%. In addition, 75% of those requiring a second intervention underwent tympanoplasty repair and 25% had fat patch myringoplasty. None required a third intervention.

Conclusions

Our treatment algorithm for children with tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement appears to be successful and is an excellent model for other clinicians.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0196-0709(05)00224-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.11.007

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 4 , Pages 238-243, July 2006