American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 388-391, November 2007

The standard clinical smell testing protocol of the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics in Amman, Jordan: JOR test

  • Azmi T. Ahmad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman, Jordan
  • ,
  • Mousa Abu Jbara, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman, Jordan
  • ,
  • Dana Hiyasat, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman, Jordan
  • ,
  • Anwar Bateiha, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
  • ,
  • Kamel M. Ajlouni, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman, Jordan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, Amman 11942, Jordan. Tel.: +962 65353374; fax: +962 65356670.

Received 22 September 2006

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was the development of a simple clinical smell test that can be applied in Jordan and its validation against one of the standard tests, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Test (UPSIT, Sensonics Inc, Haddon Heights, NJ).

Design

A prospective validation study of a locally designed smell test was done.

Setting

The study was conducted at the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism in Amman, Jordan.

Participants

Fifty subjects were recruited to participate in this study. Twenty-five were normal healthy individuals, and 25 were patients with Kallmann syndrome.

Intervention and main outcome measures

All 50 participants underwent 2 tests, the UPSIT and the locally designed test (JOR test).The scores of all patients in both tests were compared. Test-retest reliability was determined in the same 50 subjects. All patients completed the study.

Results

Subjects who scored within normal limits on the UPSIT scored 8 to 10 on the JOR test, and people who were abnormal on the UPSIT scored between 0 and 5 on the JOR test. The correlation between the scores of both tests was almost perfect (r = 0.984, P = .000). When both tests were classified as normal and abnormal, there was a complete agreement (κ statistic = 1). Both sensitivity and specificity were 100%.

Conclusion

Given its highly significant correspondence to the UPSIT and the odor thresholds of Jordanians, our test proved valid and useful as a cross-cultural clinical test of olfactory function. In addition, it is an inexpensive, rapid test. Unfortunately, the data lacked persons with moderate impairment of smell. Therefore, the new test may not be used to assess this category of patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0196-0709(06)00294-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.009

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 388-391, November 2007