American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 3 , Pages 171-176, May 2008

Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables

  • Lee P. Smith, MD
  • ,
  • Soham Roy, MD, FAAP

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami–Miller School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Box 016960 (D-48), Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

Received 14 February 2007 published online 17 March 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to systematically explore the fire and burn risk associated with fiberoptic cables and electrosurgical devices.

Materials and methods

A 300-W light source was connected to a standard gray fiberoptic light cable. The end of the cable was either rested atop or buried within a cotton towel or polypropylene drape in the presence or absence of 100% oxygen for up to 10 minutes. A monopolar electrosurgical device set at 1 W, 10 W, or 30 W was tested on a cotton towel or polypropylene drape for a period of 30 seconds. All trials were repeated.

Results

Resting the light cable on top of the cotton towel or polypropylene drape with or without oxygen produced no result. Burying the end of the cable within the drape produced a hole in the drape within 15 seconds both with and without oxygen. Burying the end of the cable within the cotton towel produced a yellow discoloration after 2 minutes both with and without oxygen. The monopolar electrosurgical device set at 30 W burned immediately through the polypropylene drape, producing a skin burn. All other trials with monopolar electrocautery produced no result. No flame or fire was produced in any trial.

Conclusions

Fiberoptic cables and electrosurgical generators represent a serious burn risk for surgical patients, with operating room drapes and towels affording only limited protection. Otolaryngologists should be keenly aware of the risks that these devices represent because our specialty uses them frequently.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented as a poster presentation at the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery annual meeting, Toronto, September 2006.

PII: S0196-0709(07)00085-3

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.05.006

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 3 , Pages 171-176, May 2008