American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 242-249, July 2008

Donor bone marrow in laryngeal transplantation: results of a rat study☆☆

  • Samir S. Khariwala, MD

      Affiliations

    • Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 758 Waymarket Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
  • ,
  • Olivia Dan, BS

      Affiliations

    • Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Robert R. Lorenz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Aleksandra Klimczak, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Maria Siemionow, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Marshall Strome, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 9 August 2007 published online 20 March 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

The concept of donor bone marrow transplantation has been successfully used in human solid organ transplantation to increase recipient chimerism. The development of recipient chimerism is associated with a decreased need for immunosuppression and even donor-specific tolerance. In this study, we attempted to augment recipient chimerism by the transfer of donor bone marrow at the time of rat laryngeal transplant.

Study design

Experimental study in rats.

Methods

The study used a well-established semiallogeneic rat laryngeal transplant model with partial major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched Lewis-Brown-Norway donors and Lewis recipients. Donor bone marrow was introduced at transplantation via (1) intravascular injection and (2) transfer of a vascularized femoral bone graft. Recipients were treated with an established immunosuppressive regimen consisting of everolimus and anti-αβTCR monoclonal antibody for a 7-day perioperative course. Animals received a 5-day boost of the same regimen at 90 days posttransplantation. Parathyroid hormone levels and histological examination were used for rejection surveillance and scoring.

Results

Animals treated with intravenous bone marrow injection followed by perioperative and pulsed immunosuppression commonly demonstrated early rejection (90%). Animals receiving transfer of vascularized donor femur had an average rejection score of 2.9 (scale, 1-6) at 180 days posttransplantation. Mixed-lymphocyte reaction did not demonstrate donor-specific tolerance in the latter group, and chimerism was less than 1%.

Conclusions

In the rat laryngeal transplant model, donor bone marrow does not consistently lead to augmentation of peripheral chimerism using our established pulsed immunosuppression protocol. In many cases, rejection occurred earlier than animals not receiving bone marrow. This may be due to several different factors including (1) an element of graft-vs-host disease, (2) inability to establish bone marrow engraftment due to our short-term perioperative immunosuppression regimen, or (3) preferential rejection of donor bone marrow cells.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Triological Society Annual Meeting (COSM), April 2007, San Diego, CA.

☆☆ This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Triological Society. In addition, support was in part received from an internal Research Protocol Committee grant from The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. This study was performed in accordance with the PHS Policy on Human Case and Use of Laboratory Animals, the NIH guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C et seq.). The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

PII: S0196-0709(07)00118-4

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.08.007

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 242-249, July 2008