American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 96-103, March 2010

Tympanometry in infants with middle ear effusion having been identified using spiral computerized tomography

  • Liu Zhiqi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Hubei Women and Children Hospital, Wuhan, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology, Hubei Women and Children Hospital, Wuhan 430070, China.
  • ,
  • Yang Kun, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • ,
  • Huang Zhiwu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Received 3 September 2008 published online 31 March 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

This study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic value of 226 and 1000 Hz probe-tone tympanometry in infants with effusion in the middle ear.

Methods

For this study, we recruited 52 infants with ages 42 days to 6 months as clinical subjects in a hearing-ability screening program. After a spiral computerized tomography (CT) scan of the patients, we tested their hearing using tympanometry of 2 probe-tone frequencies: 226 and 1000 Hz. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the results of the CT scan: group 1 patients had normal middle ears without fluid, and group 2 patients had ears with fluid. We recorded the tympanograms and their percentage of every type and compared the tympanometric results with CT to get the concordance rate between tympanometry and CT diagnose while obtaining the normal values of 1000 Hz tympanometric measures.

Results

The 226 Hz probe-tone tympanograms of middle ears with fluid differed greatly from those without. At 226 Hz, their tympanograms were single-peaked tympanograms (51.06%), double-peaked tympanograms (44.68%), flat tympanograms (2.13%), and negative-pressure tympanograms (2.13%) for the group with normal middle ears, but single-peaked tympanograms (77.19%), double-peaked tympanograms (19.30%), and flat tympanograms (3.51%) for the group with middle ear effusion. The 1000 Hz probe-tone tympanograms included single-peaked or flat-type tympanograms in both the normal middle ear group and the group with middle ear effusion. The group with normal middle ears was identified by spiral CT, and its tympanograms mostly had a single peak (97.87%) during 1000 Hz tympanometry. Tympanograms of the middle ear effusion group mostly had a flat curve (98.25%). When the Liden/Jerger classification system was used to evaluate the tympanograms, normal tympanograms were single-peaked, and flat tympanograms indicated middle ear effusion. According to this standard, the concordance rate between the 1000 Hz tympanometry (98.08%) and CT diagnosis was higher than when 226 Hz tympanometry (25%) (P < .05) was performed, and the value of κ was equal to 0.961 between 1000 Hz tympanometry and CT diagnosis.

Conclusions

In clinical practice, 1000 Hz tympanometry, not 226 Hz, is recommended to determine the presence of middle ear fluid in infants younger than 6 months.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All of the authors who have contributed to, read, and approved this article. None of the authors has any conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. This article has not been previously published, nor is it under consideration elsewhere.

PII: S0196-0709(08)00250-0

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.11.008

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 96-103, March 2010