Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 114-116 (March 2010)


View previous. 11 of 20 View next.

Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy

Constantinos Bourolias, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Antonios Gkotsis, MD, Anastasios Kontaxakis, MD, Panagiotis Tsoukarelis, MD

Received 14 October 2008 published online 31 March 2009.

Abstract 

Statement of problem

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine spray 10%, compared with tetracaine 2% solution, as a local anesthetic for patients undergoing transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.

Method of study

A prospective study was conducted on patients undergoing transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy. Microsurgical sponges were applied in each side of the nose for 10 minutes before laryngoscopy. Patients were randomly classified into group A and group B, in which tetracaine 2% solution and lidocaine spray 10% were used, respectively. Patients were asked to evaluate the severity of pain during the procedure by a visual analog scale. Patients data, pain score, and potential complications were placed in a database and statistically assessed.

Main results

Our series consisted of 48 patients. Statistical analysis showed significant lower mean nasal discomfort score in favor of the tetracaine group (2.29 vs 3.04 [P < .001]). No tetracaine complications or side effects occurred.

Principal conclusion

Neurosurgical sponge application of tetracaine 2% solution is an easy, safe, inexpensive, and effective analgesia for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.

Department of Otolaryngology, Naval Hospital of Crete, Souda, Chania, Crete, Greece

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology, Naval Hospital of Crete, K. Palma 14 Chania, Crete Greece. Tel.: +30 6977423823; fax: +30 2821087067.

PII: S0196-0709(08)00253-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.11.011


View previous. 11 of 20 View next.

Advertisement