American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 217-220, July 2010

Magnetic resonance imaging screening in acoustic neuroma

  • Jonathan R. Newton, MRCSEd

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 64 Queens Highlands, Aberdeen AB15 4AR, UK. Tel.: +44 07753987851.
  • ,
  • Muhammad Shakeel, MRCSEd, BSc, DO-HNS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Sam Flatman, MBChB

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Craig Beattie, MBChB

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Bhasker Ram, FRCS (ORL-HNS)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

Received 14 August 2008 published online 25 June 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the definitive investigation for detection of an acoustic neuroma. It is however an expensive resource, and pick-up rate of a tumor can be as low as 1% of all patients scanned. This study aims to examine referral patterns for MRI screening for patients presenting with asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss (ASHL). A second aim was to suggest appropriate screening criteria.

Method

All 132 MRI scans performed for ASHL in the year 2005 were reviewed retrospectively along with their case records and audiograms. In addition, MRI scans and case records were reviewed for the last 30 patients diagnosed with acoustic neuromas. Information was analyzed using 2 published protocols and additional frequency-specific defined criteria.

Results

Two acoustic neuromas were picked up out of 132 scans performed. Of the scans performed for ASHL, a third did not fit with any of the published criteria. Of the 30 positive scans for a tumor, the patients/audiograms revealed that 10% did not fit the published criteria despite the patients having no other audiovestibular symptoms.

Conclusions

There appears to be no universally accepted guidelines on screening in ASHL with clinical acumen being used by most ENT consultants in this region. Applying protocols may reduce the amount of scans performed, but up to 10% of tumors may be missed by this approach.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper was presented at the 6th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery, June 30th-July 4th, 2007, Vienna, Austria.

PII: S0196-0709(09)00025-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.02.005

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 217-220, July 2010