Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Harmonic Scalpel vs “cold knife” dissection in uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Angelo Salami, MD, Massimo Dellepiane, MD, Maurizio Bavazzano, MD, Barbara Crippa, MD, Luca Guastini, MD, Renzo Mora, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 28 April 2009 published online 12 October 2009.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of this study has been to compare the Harmonic Scalpel (HS) and the “cold knife” dissection in the treatment of snoring by uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP).

Materials and methods

The investigation included 40 adult males with snoring. Patients were assigned to two homogeneous groups (A and B) and UPPP was performed using HS or “cold knife” dissection in groups A and B, respectively.

Before and 6 months after surgery, each patient was studied using the apnea-hypopnea index and a visual analogue scale of snore levels. Postoperative assessment of pain was evaluated on postoperative days 1 and 10.

All the patients underwent to a perioperative evaluation concerning the duration of surgical dissection, the amount of intraoperative blood loss and days of hospitalization.

Results

In group A, the HS provided excellent control without side effects on the adjacent structures and postoperative complications. Harmonic Scalpel's group experienced shorter operation time, lesser blood loss, fewer days of hospitalization and lower postoperative pain.

Conclusions

The use of the HS in UPPP is safe and confers some advantages over conventional methods of UPPP: its use led to diminished bleeding, shorter operation time, lesser pain, and better wound healing in the postoperative period.

ENT Department, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. ENT Department, University of Genoa, Via dei Mille 11/9, 16147, Genoa, Italy. Tel.: +39 010 3537631; fax: +39 010 3537684.

 Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no financial support for the work. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

PII: S0196-0709(09)00162-8

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.08.009

Advertisement