American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 221-227, May 2011

The importance of acoustic reflex for communication

  • Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade

      Affiliations

    • Acoustic and Instrumentation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brazil
  • ,
  • Elizângela Dias Camboim

      Affiliations

    • Faculdade de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ilka do Amaral Soares

      Affiliations

    • Faculdade de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brazil
  • ,
  • Marcus Valerius da Silva Peixoto

      Affiliations

    • Acoustic and Instrumentation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brazil
  • ,
  • Silvio Caldas Neto, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
  • ,
  • Pedro de Lemos Menezes, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Acoustic and Instrumentation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Laboratório de Instrumentação e Acústica, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Rua Jorge de Lima, 113–Trapiche, Maceió–AL CEP 57010-382. Tel.: +55 82 33156813; fax: +55 82 33156727.

Received 23 October 2009 published online 07 May 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to compare the speech recognition capacity between listeners with and without acoustic reflex using different types of noises and intensities.

Materials and methods

We studied 18 women allocated to 2 groups: acoustic reflex present (20 ears) and absent (16 ears). They were presented with 180 disyllable words (90 to each ear), emitted randomly at a fixed intensity of 40 dB above the pure tone average hearing level. At the same time, 3 types of noises were presented ipsilaterally (white, pink, and speech), one at a time, at 3 intensities: 40, 50, and 60 dB above the pure tone average hearing level.

Results

The ages and auditory thresholds were statistically equal between the groups. There was a significant difference in mean number of hits between the 2 groups for the 3 types of noises used. There was also a significant difference in mean number of hits for noise type and intensity when white and pink noise was used at 40 and 50 dB and for all the intensities when speech was used.

Conclusion

Acoustic reflex helps communication in high-noise environments and is more efficient for speech sounds.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0196-0709(10)00039-6

doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.02.002

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 221-227, May 2011