American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 269-274 , July 2011

The efficacy of rhinoplasty alone in facial rejuvenation

  • Kian Karimi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
    • ,
  • Robert T. Adelson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Otolaryngology, PO Box 100264, Gainesville, FL 32610. Tel.: +1 352 682 7670, +1 352 273 5199 (Office); fax: +1 352 392 6781.

Received 20 February 2010

References 

  1. Klugman S. The effect of age upon estimation of age. J Soc Psychol. 1947;26:29–33
  2. George PA, Hole GJ. The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces. Vis Cogn. 2000;7:485–509
  3. George PA, Hole GJ. The influence of feature-based information in the age processing of unfamiliar faces. Perception. 1998;27:295–312
  4. George PA, Hole GJ. Factors influencing the accuracy of age estimates of unfamiliar faces. Perception. 1995;24:1059–1073
  5. George PA, Hole GJ. Recognising the ageing face: the role of age in face processing. Perception. 1998;27:1123–1124
  6. Burt DM, Perrett DI. Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces—computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proc Biol Sci. 1995;259:137–143
  7. Henns R. Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1991;21:933–946
  8. Pittenger JB, Shaw RE. Perception of estimated and absolute age of facial photographs. Percept Psychophys. 1975;18:137–143
  9. Anastasi JS, Rhoces MG. An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005;12:1043–1047
  10. Deffenbacher KA, Vetter T, Johanson J, et al. Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness. Perception. 1998;27:1233–1243
  11. Koch RJ, Chavez A, Dagum P, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of computer imaging in cosmetic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:195–198
  12. Papel ID, Park RI. Computer imaging for instruction in facial plastic surgery in a residency program. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114:1454–1460
  13. Mattison RC. Facial video image processing: standard facial image capturing, software modification, development of a surgical plan, and comparison of presurgical and postsurgical results. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29:385–389
  14. Bronz G. The role of the computer imaging system in modern aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:159–163
  15. Schoenrock LD. Five-year facial plastic experience with computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg. 1990;7:13–137
  16. Adelson RT, DeFatta RJ, Bassichis BA. Objective assessment of the accuracy of computer-simulated imaging in rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29:151–155
  17. Wong BJ, Karimi K, et al. Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:962–974
  18. Yaar M, Gilchrest BA. Skin aging: postulated mechanisms and consequent changes in structure and function. Clin Geriatr Med. 2001;17:617–630
  19. Moody M, Ross AT. Rhinoplasty in the aging patient. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22:112–119
  20. Stupak HD, Johnson CM. Rhinoplasty for the aging nose. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006;85:154–155
  21. Powell N, Humphries B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984;
  22. Zimbler MS, Ham J. Aesthetic facial analysis. In:  Cummings CW,  Flint PW,  Harker LA, et al. editor. Cummings Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier-Mosby; 2005;p. 513–528
  23. Yoshino M, Taniguchi M, et al. A new retrieval system for a database of 3D facial images. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;148:113–120
  24. Laudemann K, Petruchin O, Mack MG, et al. Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with or without pterygomaxillary disjunction based upon preoperative and post-expansion 3D computed tomography data. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;13:159–169

PII: S0196-0709(10)00067-0

doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.03.006

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 269-274 , July 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution